>First yeah Librewolf group is small, doesn’t add a lot and everyfactor they do Might be carried out manually by Firefox clients themselves. Neverthemuch less The primary set off I said Librewolf is to cease some clients saying oh Firefox doesn’t Do this or that.
So why you don’t redirect them On to Arkenfox? It’s greater than suggesting a “””fork”””, which IMO, has no objective. Presently, I don’t see how LibreWolf is related to this “dialogue”, it’s extra of a strawman than somefactor.
>Firefox is a BROWSER which occurs To take care of its personal ENGINE in distinction to Brave.
You’re making this declare like sustaining a rendering engine is An straightforward process. You Ought to have funding, assets, and A pretty safe consumer base.
>So some arguments about defaults are moot coz You understand clients can change it anymethod They want. And This will be carried out by way of *primary* settings Which incorporates DRM, telemetry, dFPI and completely differents.
It’s solely “moot” for The Sort of people, Similar to you, who don’t thoughts altering A lot of prefs (with a consumer.js or manually) and sacrifice usability for privateness. The typical Joe tends To solely set up a browser and anticipate it to work, that’s why OOTB Is important. That is one factor that Brave and completely different privateness-centric browsers have understood For A pair of years
>Second You will Have The power to add add-on like uBO in any system collectively with Android which is lightning years forward of Brave’s inner adblocker.
As quickly as extra, Are you able to identify a function of …….